Confidence Building Measure (CBM) Korea Selatan Terhadap Tiongkok

Strategi Normalisasi Hubungan Diplomatik Pasca Boikot Ekonomi Tahun 2016

Authors

  • Tutut Paramita Sugiyanti
  • Tulus Yuniasih

Keywords:

diplomatic relations, economic boycott, strategy, China, South Korea

Abstract

In July 2016, South Korea and the United States agreed to install the THAAD system in South Korea. This is a defense measure taken by South Korea because of North Korea's nuclear test activities that is considered as a threat. However, the action that is considered a step towards self-defense for South Korea is actually considered a threat to China. In results, China put sanction towards South Korea in form of an economic boycott. This study aims to analyze the strategies used by South Korea in improving diplomatic relations between South Korea and China after the boycott. In analyzing the case, the authors uses the concept of action-reaction patterns, security dilemma, and confidence building measures. Periodization of research was limited between 2016 – 2019, after China began to implement the economic boycott over South Korea until an agreement was reached to normalize relations between the two countries. The results of this study indicate that the enactment of economic boycotts carried out by China against South Korea has created severe impacts on South Korea's economy and security. CBMs was then implemented by South Korea as its strategy to normalize and improve relations, as well as build mutual trust between the two countries.

References

Abrahamian, Andray dan Daekwon Son. (2017). “Moving On: China Resolves THAAD Dispute with South Korea”. 38North. Diakses dari https://www.38north.org/2017/11/abrahamianson110917/ pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2019.
Berlinger, Joshua. (2017). “North Korea Casts Shadow as Trump and Moon Meet for First Time”. CNN. Diakses dari https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/28/asia/south-korea-moon-jae-in-donald-trump-meeting/index.html pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2019.
Centre for Strategic & International Studies. (2019). “Confidence-Building Measures.” Diakses dari https://www.csis.org/programs/international-security-program/isp-archives/asia-division/cross-strait-security-initiativ-1 pada tanggal 21 Juli 2019.
Choe, Sang Hun. (2017). “Moon Jae-In of South Korea and China Move to Soothe Tensions”. New York Times. Diakses dari https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/world/asia/china-south-korea-moon-jae-in.html pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2019.
Choi, Kang. (2018). “South Korea”. The Asan Forum. Diakses dari http://www.theasanforum.org/south-korea/ pada tanggal 27 Juni 2019.
Chung, Jae Ho. (2018). “South Korea’s Strategic Approach to China (or Lack of it).” Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies.
Easley, Leif-Eric. (2017). “China’s Charm Offensive on South Korea Is Starting to Work”. Foreign Policy. Diakses dari https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/11/13/chinas-charm-offensive-on-south-korea-is-starting-to-work/ pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2019.
Hankyoreh. (2017a). “Belt and Road Forum Signals Reopening of South Korea-China Diplomacy”. Diakses dari http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/794810.html pada tanggal 2 Agustus 2019.
Hankyoreh. (2017b). “China Invites South Korean Government Delegation to Belt and Road Summit”. Diakses dari http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/794583.html pada tanggal 2 Agustus 2019.
Jung, Min Hee. (2017). “Lotte Faces 500 Billion Won Losses in China over THAAD Retaliation”. Business Korea. Diakses dari http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=18007 pada tanggal 19 Mei 2019.
Kompas.com. (2017). ”Sekarang, China jadi Negara Paling Dibenci Rakyat Korea Selatan.” Diakses dari https://amp.kompas.com/internasional/read/2017/03/21/14092351/sekarang.china.jadi.negara.paling.dibenci.rakyat.korea.selatan pada tanggal 20 Juni 2019.
Mutmainnah, Rosyina. (2018). “Hubungan Pemerintah Korea Selatan-Chaebol Pasca Penerapan Sanksi Tiongkok atas Penempatan THAAD 2016-2017”. Skripsi, Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Meick, Ethan dan Nargiza Salidjanova. (2017). “China’s Response to U.S.-South Korean Missile Defense System Deployment and it’s Implications”. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commision: Staff Research Report.
Permatasari, Decyani. (2019). ”Analisis Penggunaan Three Nos oleh Korea Selatan untuk Mengatasi Boikot di Cina Akibat Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)”. Journal of International Relations, Vol. 5, No.1.
Snyder, Scott & See-Won Byun. (2017). “North Korea, THAAD Overshadow Beijing and Seoul’s 25th Anniversary.” Comparative Connections, Vol. 19, Issue 2: 81–90.
Swaine, Michael D. (2017). “Chinese Views on South Korea’s Deployment of THAAD”. China Leadership Monitor, No. 52.
Yonhap News Agency. (2017). “Damage from China’s Ban on S. Korean Tours estimated at 7.5 tln Won.” Diakses dari http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/business/2017/12/03/0502000000AEN20171203004100320.html pada tanggal 11 Mei 2019.
Yonhap News Agency. (2019). “(2nd LD) Xi Says Many Things Possible from China-S. Korea Cooperation”. Diakses dari https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20190627010952315 pada tanggal 20 juli 2019.
Yonhap News Agency. (2017). “(LEAD) Military, Lotte Sign Land-swap Deal for THAAD Deployment”. Diakses dari https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20170228004051315 pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2019.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-20

How to Cite

Sugiyanti, T. P., & Yuniasih, T. (2019). Confidence Building Measure (CBM) Korea Selatan Terhadap Tiongkok: Strategi Normalisasi Hubungan Diplomatik Pasca Boikot Ekonomi Tahun 2016. Balcony, 3(2), 167–175. Retrieved from https://jom.fisip.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/balcony/article/view/211

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) , the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.