Memahami Politik dan Hubungan Internasional Melalui Seni Mural Politik di Jakarta Selatan
Keywords:
political mural, social criticism, political education, international relations, South JakartaAbstract
This research explores the role of political mural art in conveying sociopolitical issues and fostering a deeper understanding of international relations in South Jakarta, particularly during times of crisis. The study underscores how political murals, both in physical public spaces and virtual environments, serve as potent forms of social criticism and political communication. Rooted in democratic values such as freedom of expression and public engagement, these murals reflect local grievances and resonate with global political movements. The focus of this research is primarily on political murals created during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Genocide wrapped in War by Israel against the Palestinian people, as these events significantly influenced the content and tone of mural art in South Jakarta. By critically examining the emergence of these murals in response to the pandemic and international conflicts, this study seeks to highlight their effectiveness in voicing social criticism of governmental policies, especially concerning issues such as public health, economic inequality, and foreign policy. The murals not only critique the local government’s handling of the pandemic but also reflect global solidarity movements, such as support for Palestine, linking local concerns with international struggles for justice. To achieve a comprehensive understanding, this research employs a qualitative methodology, utilizing in-depth interviews, questionnaires, and literature reviews. Data were collected from a diverse range of sources, including mural artists, members of art communities, and residents who actively engage with or observe murals in their surroundings. These sources provided insights into the motivations of artists, the impact of murals on public opinion, and the sociopolitical context that drives the creation of these works. The outcomes of this research offer valuable insights into the transformative power of political art in South Jakarta, emphasizing its role not only as a vehicle for protest and criticism but also as a means of educating the public about key political issues. By linking local struggles with global movements, these murals bridge the gap between domestic politics and international affairs, providing a platform for marginalized voices and contributing to the democratization of public space.
References
Abaza, M. (2013). Walls, segregating downtown Cairo and the Mohammed Mahmud Street graffiti. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(1), 122-139.
Allen, S. (2019). Fight the power: Redressing displacement and building a just city for Black lives in Vancouver. Master's Thesis. Simon Fraser University.
Atlas Obscura. (2021). Vancouver, BC: Jimi Hendrix Shrine. Retrieved from https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/jimi-hendrix-shrine
Budiawan, T. (2018). Art activism and social movement in contemporary Indonesia. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 6(4), 340-345.
Clark, J. (2016). Street art and graffiti. Encyclopedia Britannica.
Coombs, A. E. (2018). Graffiti and street art: Reading, writing and representing the city. Routledge.
Darisman, A. (2014). Karya graffiti sebagai representasi persoalan sosial di Kota Bandung. Humaniora, 5, 749.
Dewey, J. (1998). Budaya dan kebebasan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Entertain, Fungi dan Macam Seine Graffiti. (2014, October). Retrieved from http://www.insatunesia.com/2014/10/pengertian-fungsi-dan-macam-seni-grafiti.html
Evans, G. (2017). The art of resistance: Cultural protest against the Austrian far right in the early twenty-first century. In Social Movements and Culture (pp. 183-207). Routledge.
Ferrell, J. (2015). Ghost ethnography: On crimes against reality and their excavation. Paper presented at Crimes Against Reality common session, Hamburg, Germany, 4–6 May 2015.
Ferrell, J., & Weide, R. D. (2010). Spot theory. City, 14(1-2), 48-62.
Fisher, M. (2014). Ghosts of my life: Writings on depression, hauntology and lost futures. Zero Books.
Frank, S., & Ristic, M. (2020). Urban fallism monuments, iconoclasm and activism. City - Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action, 24(3-4), 552-564.
Gaventa, J., & Martorano, B. (2016). Inequality, power and participation – Revisiting the links. IDS Bulletin, 47, 10.19088/1968-2016.164.
Georgeon, D. (2012). Revolutionary graffiti. Wasafiri, 27(4), 70-75.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Polity Press.
Gushendra, R. (2017). The role of graffiti and mural as alternative public sphere for society. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 746-753.
Guzman-Sanchez, T. (2019). Culture jamming and street art: The political power of urban creativity. Routledge.
Hall, T., & Robertson, I. (2001). Public art and urban regeneration: Advocacy, claims and critical debates. Landscape Research, 26(1), 5-26.
Harnett, A. (2010). Aestheticized geographies of conflict: The politicization of culture and the culture of politics in Belfast’s mural tradition. In Contested Cultural Heritage (pp. 69-107).
Hunter, A., Pattilo, M., & Zandria, R. (2016). Black placemaking: Celebration, play, and poetry. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(7-8), 31-56.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 222-237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hegarty, P. (2014). Graffiti and street art: Reading, writing and representing the city. Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (2006). Teori tindakan komunikatif I: Rasio dan rasionalisasi masyarakat. Kreasi Wacana.
Habermas, J. (2007). Modernity: An unfinished project (1980). In C. Calhoun, J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff, & I. Virk (Eds.), Contemporary sociological theory (pp. 360). Blackwell Publishing.
Habermas, J. (2010). Ruang publik, sebuah kajian tentang kategori masyarakat borjuis. Kreasi Wacana.
Hetherington, K. (2016). Guerrilla art as a response to social, economic and political change: Case studies from around the world. In The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research (pp. 589-607). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lipsky, M. (1965). Protest as a political resource. The University of Wisconsin.
Popo, Pelukis Mural Pengkritik Social. (2013, June 18). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah/2013/06/130618_tokoh_ryanriyadi_pop_pelukismural
Rachman, V. (2013, June 28). Sate Lingkar. Retrieved from http://satulingkar.com/detail/read/8/2245/seni-untuk-publik
Sean Martin-Iverson. (2021). The value of the underground: Punk, politics, and creative urbanism in Bandung, Indonesia. Cultural Studies, 35(1), 110-135. DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2020.1844261
Sugiyono (2013). Metode Penelitian KuantitatifKualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Alfabeta, 2013. 247-252
Tormey, S. (2015). Culture jamming: Activism and the art of cultural resistance. NYU Press.
Vail, M. D. (2015). The mural handbook: A guide for educators, artists, and community members. R&L Education.
Winarso, B. (2017). A review on graffiti phenomenon: A study around Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of u- and e-Service, Science and Technology, 10, 183-198.
Yusuf, S. (2019). Seni mural sebagai medium ekspresi politik di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 25(1), 1-11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mohamad Hapsara Pramudita; Andrea Abdul Rahman Azzqy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) , the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Balcony (Budi Luhur Journal of Contemporary Diplomacy) published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
